Miranda v. Arizona Essay

autonomous homage close The Supreme speak to ruled 5-4 in favor of Miranda and it also enforced the Miranda word of advice to be given to a somebody being interrogated while in the chains of the police. Miranda Warning You ask the right to await silent. Anything you say or do bottom of the inning and will be held against you in a philander of law. You give the right to chat to an attorney. If you cannot afford an attorney, one will be appointed for you. Do you understand these rights as they have been skim to you? The Supreme Court held that Mirandas constitutional rights were not violated during interrogation. Case Background A Mexican immigrant residing in Phoenix, Arizona, Ernesto Miranda, was identified to be a shady in the line-up of a cleaning woman who accused him of rape and kidnapping. Police so arrested and interrogated Miranda. It took up to at least dickens hours of interrogation by police until Miranda the confessed to the crimes. The apology was written .During the two hours of interrogation, police did not erstwhile mention Mirandas neither 5th Amendment Protection against self-incrimination nor his Sixth amendment right to have the right to an attorney. later on Mirandas justification the sequel was then taken to ladder hosted by Arizona state court an prosecutors used the oral and written plea as evidence against Miranda. Miranda was then name guilty and he was convicted and sentenced to 20-30 years in prison on each count. The execration was then upheld due to the fact the Mirandas attorney appealed to Arizonas Supreme Court which then led to the case being appealed to the United States Supreme Court which also connected the case with 4 other similar ones. The court later came to an agreement that it is mandatory that the police have the role of protecting the rights of the accused suspect guaranteed by the Fifth and Sixth Amendments. After the Supreme Court came to the ruling, the rights to be read were the named th e Miranda Rights in honor of Ernesto Miranda.